How ASC 842 Affects Financial Ratios and Leasing Strategies
The implementation of the ASC 842 lease accounting standard has fundamentally shifted how leases are recorded, now requiring nearly all leases to appear on the balance sheet. This change directly impacts critical financial ratios that stakeholders rely on to assess a business's financial health, such as debt-to-equity and return on assets (ROA). These ratios are used to determine creditworthiness, investment potential, and overall financial performance. Understanding the impact of ASC 842 on these ratios—and how to optimize leasing strategies under the new standard—can be essential for businesses aiming to maintain financial stability and appeal to stakeholders.
Key Financial Ratios Impacted by ASC 842
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
- Impact: ASC 842 introduces right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet, significantly increasing the liabilities component. As a result, the debt-to-equity ratio often increases, indicating a higher level of financial leverage.
- Stakeholder Implication: A higher debt-to-equity ratio can affect a company’s perceived risk, potentially impacting borrowing costs or lending terms.
Current Ratio
- Impact: With ASC 842, portions of lease liabilities are classified as current liabilities, which can reduce the current ratio (Current Assets/Current Liabilities). This may suggest lower short-term liquidity, even though it’s simply a result of the accounting standard.
- Stakeholder Implication: Creditors and suppliers may see a reduced ability to meet short-term obligations, which could influence credit terms.
Return on Assets (ROA)
- Impact: ASC 842 increases total assets by recognizing ROU assets. Since net income typically remains unaffected, ROA (Net Income/Total Assets) may decline due to the expanded asset base.
- Stakeholder Implication: A lower ROA may suggest to investors and analysts that the company’s efficiency in utilizing assets has declined, potentially affecting investment decisions.
EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization)
- Impact: Under ASC 842, lease expenses are split into interest and amortization components, removing the full lease expense from EBITDA calculations. This increases EBITDA by removing operating lease costs, making it appear that the company has higher earnings before accounting for financing and capital charges.
- Stakeholder Implication: Higher EBITDA can appear positive for investors, especially when comparing profitability to companies not yet affected by ASC 842.
Interest Coverage Ratio
- Impact: With operating leases now showing interest expense, the interest coverage ratio (EBIT/Interest Expense) is impacted. The addition of lease-related interest may lower this ratio, reflecting higher financial burden.
- Stakeholder Implication: Lenders often use this ratio to gauge a company’s ability to cover interest payments. A lower ratio might raise concerns about financial strain.
Asset Turnover Ratio
- Impact: The ROU asset increases total assets, which can reduce the asset turnover ratio (Revenue/Total Assets), indicating a potential decline in asset efficiency.
- Stakeholder Implication: A decrease in asset turnover may suggest less efficiency in generating revenue from assets, influencing investor perception.
Leasing Strategies to Optimize Financial Ratios
Given these impacts, companies can consider the following leasing strategies to achieve more favorable ratios:
Lease Term Optimization
Shorter lease terms can reduce the total lease liability on the balance sheet, helping to minimize the debt-to-equity ratio impact. Carefully assess lease terms and renewal options to find a balance that maintains operational needs while controlling liabilities.
Utilizing Variable Lease Structures
Some leases may offer variable payment options based on usage or performance, which can reduce fixed liabilities. This keeps some expenses off the balance sheet and can help improve both debt-to-equity and current ratios.
Negotiating More Favorable Lease Terms
Renegotiating leases to include lower initial liabilities or lease payments can improve overall balance sheet health. Lower fixed payments help reduce lease liabilities, positively impacting ratios such as debt-to-equity and current ratio.
Leveraging Subleases and Asset Utilization
Where possible, subleasing excess space or assets can offset lease costs and increase ROA. This strategy enables companies to maintain operational flexibility while minimizing financial impacts on their balance sheets.
Evaluating Lease vs. Buy Decisions
For high-value assets, compare the financial impact of leasing versus buying. Purchasing certain assets may keep liabilities lower and prevent high lease-related liabilities, improving debt-to-equity ratios.
How iLeasePro Can Help Address ASC 842 Challenges
iLeasePro is designed to support organizations in managing lease accounting compliance under ASC 842. Our platform offers robust tools to accurately track lease data, generate ROU asset and liability calculations, and model the effects of lease modifications. By leveraging iLeasePro’s comprehensive reporting features, businesses can gain insights into how leasing strategies impact financial ratios, enabling informed decision-making. iLeasePro also facilitates the integration of lease data into financial reports, helping your organization maintain transparency, streamline compliance, and present favorable financial ratios to stakeholders.
Our goal at iLeasePro is to simplify compliance and provide strategic advantages, ensuring that ASC 842 challenges are manageable and that your business remains resilient in the face of accounting changes.
Tour of iLeasePro
Schedule a Demo
Check Out Knowledge Base
