Stay Informed
iLeasePro Newsletter

Expert Knowledge to Your Inbox - SignUp Now!

How to Compare Multiple Leases Effectively in Negotiations

John Meedzan

In a previous Blog posting, we introduced our readers to the Lease Analysis component of iLeasePro, our comprehensive lease management technology solution specifically designed for lessees. We indicated that Lease Analysis is an invaluable tool that supports lease negotiations and lease reassessment by providing the user with the technology for evaluating all the financial terms and conditions associated with alternative leasing opportunities and facilitating an “apples to apples” comparison of those alternatives.

A narrative description can only do so much to explain the capabilities of Lease Analysis, therefore, in this whitepaper, we present an example of a proposed transaction and how Lease Analysis can be utilized in the decision making process.

Lease 1 rent payment is for $25 per square foot in the first year increasing $1 per square foot each year to $31 in the final year of the lease. The landlord will not provide any TI allowance and there are $50,000 of other lease costs that must be paid by the Lessee. Additionally, for Lease 1, the landlord is proposing a lease with expense-stops and Acme is estimating that it will incur expense chargebacks of $82,813 over the seven year term of the lease based upon the base year costs and its 15% pro rata share of the property.

Lease 2 has twelve months of free rent in the first year of the lease with rent of $35 per square foot beginning in the second year and increasing $1 per square foot each year to $40 in the final year of the lease. The landlord for Lease 2 will provide a TI allowance of $150,000 with $10,000 in other lease costs that must be paid by the Lessee. For Lease 2, the landlord is proposing a lease with expense-stops and Acme is estimating that it will incur expense chargebacks of $51,529 over the seven year term of the lease based upon the base year costs and its 10% pro rata share of the property.

Lease 3 has rent beginning at $30 per square foot in the first year and increasing $1 each year to $36 in the final year of the lease. The landlord here will fund a TI allowance of $300,000 and there are other lease costs of $20,000 to be borne by the Lessee. For Lease 3, the landlord is proposing a lease with expense-stops and Acme is estimating that it will incur expense chargebacks of $99,376 over the seven year term of the lease based upon the base year costs and its 15% pro rata share of the property. Acme is using Lease Analysis to evaluate these alternatives and, in order to produce a comprehensive due diligence analysis, only certain basic information is required to be entered into iLeasePro, namely, property/unit description, square footage, lease term, rent payments, expense chargeback estimates, TI requirements, TI allowances, other lease costs, amortization period for TIs and other lease costs and a discount rate for present value calculations. Here Acme is using 6% as the discount since this is its cost of borrowing.

Lease Analysis produces the following report for the evaluation of the three alternatives.

Commencement Date 1/1/2014
Expiration Date 12/31/2020
Lease Term (Months) 84
Lease Term (Years) 7
Rentable Square Feet 10,000
Discount Rate 6.0%

 

 

 

 

 

Lease 1 Lease 2 Lease 3
Property Sq Ft 150,000 100,000 150,000
Lessee ProRata for CAM 15% 10% 15%
Base Rent PSF $25 $35 $30
Base Rent Annual Amount $250,000 $350,000 $300,000
Free Rent Months 0 12 0
Free Rent Amortization 0 12 0
Tenant Improvement Allowance PSF $0 $15 $30
Tenant Improvement Allowance $0 $150,000 $300,000
Tenant Improvement Total Cost $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
Tenant Improvement Cost Amortization 84 84 84
Other Lease Total Cost $50,000 $10,000 $20,000
Other Lease Total Cost Amortization 84 84 84
Rent Payments (PSF)
2014 $250,000 $0 $300,000
2015 $260,000 $350,000 $310,000
2016 $270,000 $360,000 $320,000
2017 $280,000 $370,000 $330,000
2018 $290,000 $380,000 $340,000
2019 $300,000 $390,000 $350,000
2020 $310,000 $400,000 $360,000
Base Rent $1,750,000 $2,450,000 $2,100,000
Escalations $210,000 $150,000 $210,000
Free Rent $0 -$350,000 $0
Annual Rent Payment $1,960,000 $2,250,000 $2,310,000
Present Value of Annual Rent Payment $1,643,100 $1,835,657 $1,938,964
Average Annual Rent Payment $280,000 $321,429 $330,000
Net Effective Annual Rent Payment $277,676 $310,217 $327,676
Expense Chargebacks $82,813 $51,529 $99,376
Tenant Improvements $300,000 $150,000 $0
Other Lease Costs $50,000 $10,000 $20,000
Total Costs $432,813 $211,529 $119,376
Total Annual Rent Cost $2,392,813 $2,461,528 $2,429,376
Present Value of Total Annual Rent Cost $2,004,753 $2,011,845 $2,034,817
Average Total Annual Rent Cost $341,830 $351,647 $347,054
Net Effective Total Annual Rent Cost $338,794 $339,992 $343,875

 

 

Notice that the report displays all the critical information necessary to evaluate the lease alternatives. The calculations of annual rent payments and annual rent costs include amortization of rental concessions, TIs and other lease costs over the term of the lease. Especially helpful are the present value and the net effective rent calculations to determine the true cost of the alternatives. In evaluating the three alternatives, Acme has a number of variables to consider.

Lease 1 presents the lowest rent payments and notice that when other costs, such as outlays for TIs, other lease costs and expense chargebacks are considered, the total cost, average rent cost and net effective rent for this alternative are also the lowest on both an absolute and present value basis. However, with this option, Acme must make upfront cash payments of $350,000 for TI and other lease costs . In Lease 2, Acme gets the benefit of free rent for the first year of the lease and a $150,000 TI allowance so the cash requirements in the first year are the lowest among the three alternatives. However, rent payments increase substantially over the term of the lease and total cost, average rent and net effective rent, on both an absolute and present value basis, are higher than Lease 1. Lease 3 presents the highest rent payments but also has the highest TI allowance and a rather modest amount for other leased costs. The resulting total cost, average cost and net effective rent are also higher than Lease 1.

Which lease options should Acme choose? The answer may not be as obvious as it seems. The initial choice might be Lease 1 because of the lowest cost results for most of the metrics. But cash payments early in the term of the lease may be a critical factor to an organization that has cash flow concerns. That might make Lease 2 or Lease 3 a more attractive alternative. Maybe Lease 2 is in a more prestigious location than Lease 1 and justifies the extra $1,198 per year effective rent. Conversely, perhaps Acme has substantial cash at the beginning of the lease term and wants to have as low cash payments as possible over the term of the lease. In addition, Acme may know that it will be likely to renew the lease after the seven year term and may want to enter into those negotiations with the lowest rent payments in the seventh year of the lease term. Once again, that might make Lease 1 a likely choice.

We are not here to draw a conclusion in this example. We cannot possibly know all of the considerations that would enter into a final conclusion. However, we have demonstrated that Lease Analysis can provide the user with an easy to evaluate, side by side comparison of all the relevant information necessary to draw a conclusion based on its business needs and situation. Too many times, lessees focus on only one aspect of a potential transaction when making a decision – the annual rent payments. But the other costs associated with the transaction should not be overlooked. For example, the negotiations involving the TI allowance or free rent are often critical issues for most office leases. A healthy TI allowance can mitigate much of the cost associated with setting up or moving an office. Free rent can be a critical factor for a start up entity. Lease Analysis can be instrumental in helping the user determine how these aspects of the lease fit into the overall negotiations.

Too often lease management systems do not consider the need for a technology solution to assist in sorting out all the critical issues associated with evaluating lease alternatives and providing the user with the statistical tools for an effective negotiation. In fact, this is the most important part of the process – understanding all the aspects of the alternatives and getting the best deal. In planning iLeasePro, we were determined to develop an end to end technology solution that provided critical assistance to the user during the full life cycle of the lease. Our Lease Analysis component provides that type of critical assistance.



Related: iLeasePro Free Trial, iLeaseXpress, iLeaseXpress Unlimited, ASC 842 Financial Reporting, ASC 842 Balance Sheet Reporting, ASC 842 Income Statement Reporting, ASC 842 Cash Flow Reporting, ASC 842 Statement of Shareholder Equity, ASC 842 Disclosure Notes, ASC 842 Management Discussion, ASC 842 Comprehensive Income, ASC 842 Glossary of Terms, ASC 842 Journal Entries, ASC 842 Software, When Is the ASC 842 Compliance Date, FASB Lease Accounting Software, Understanding the New FASB ASC 842 Lease Accounting Standard, How Does a Lease Balance Sheet Change After the New Standard?, Tracking Lease Details After ASC 842, Deferred Rent Explained Under the ASC 842, Guide to Lease Classification, Overview of Relevant Borrowing Rate, ASC 842 Footnote Disclosure, Lease Accounting, What Does Lease Accounting Software Do?, Key Features of A Lease Accounting Software, How to Never Miss Important Lease Dates, Scaling Your Lease Accounting Software to Your Business Needs, How to Select the Right Lease Solution, How to Set Up Lease Accounting Software, What is the Best Lease Accounting Software?, Overview of the Types of Leases, Equipment Lease Software, How the Right Lease Management Software Makes Equipment Leases Easier, Lease Tracking Software, How The Right Software Can Help You Manage Lease Data, Five Benefits of a SaaS Lease Management Solution, A Centralized Lease Portfolio Making Asset Management Easier, Lease Analysis 101, Lease Analysis: The Financial Metrics, Lease Abstraction, The Importance of Lease Abstraction for Lessees, The Lease Data an Abstract Should Include, What Software Do I Need for Lease Abstracting?, Navigating The ASC 842 Accounting Audit, Ultimate Lease Accounting Audit Checklist, Essential Guide To Engaging Auditors, Leveraging AI for Enhanced Year-End Audits Transitioning to the ASC 842 Standard Lease Document Management ASC 842 Short-Term Leases Practical Expedients Lease Modifications & Remeasurements Lease Variable Payments Embedded Leases Monitoring Critical Lease Dates Transportation - Navigate the ASC 842 The Impact of the ASC 842 on Regulatory Policies in Lease Management & Lease Accounting Integrating Lease Accounting into Your Month-End Closing Process The Modified Retrospective Approach in ASC 842 Determining the Incremental Borrowing Rate