Stay Informed
iLeasePro Newsletter

Expert Knowledge to Your Inbox - SignUp Now!

Qualitative Lease Disclosures: Narrative Requirements

John Meedzan

Mastering ASC 842 Qualitative Lease Narrative Requirements

In the complex landscape of lease accounting under Topic 842, we've found the distinction between quantitative figures and the narrative that contextualizes them is absolutely crucial for compliance and transparent financial reporting. Qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements refer to ensuring all contracts meeting ASC 842's definition of a lease have been identified, evaluated, and recorded in the organization's financial statements, then supported by descriptive information. This aspect is often overlooked, yet it forms the bedrock for understanding a company's lease portfolio and its impact on the financials. From our experience, incorrect or insufficient qualitative disclosures frequently lead to significant audit findings, restatements, and a lack of transparency for stakeholders. Understanding the foundational ASC 842 disclosure requirements is critical for controllers and accounting managers navigating these complexities.

Q: What are the key qualitative disclosure requirements for ASC 842? A: The key qualitative disclosure requirements under ASC 842 primarily focus on providing a narrative explanation of a lessee's leasing activities. This includes granular details about how leases are accounted for, the judgments and assumptions made, the nature of the lessee's leasing activities, and the significant effects of those activities on the financial statements. Essentially, we're telling the story behind the numbers.

What Auditors Are Actually Looking For in Qualitative Lease Disclosures: Narrative Requirements

When reviewing qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements, auditors are primarily focused on completeness, accuracy, and adherence to ASC 842. Our objective is to ensure that all relevant descriptive information has been provided and accurately reflects the company's lease population and related accounting policies. This goes beyond just checking numbers; it involves evaluating the narrative descriptions for clarity, consistency, and alignment with the quantitative data. We'll apply significant scrutiny to the internal controls over the lease identification and accounting process.

The completeness assertion refers to an auditor's objective to verify that all transactions and accounts that should be recorded have been included in the financial statements. For leases, this means ensuring every lease agreement, both explicit and embedded, is identified and properly disclosed. Auditors are looking for evidence that management has robust lease disclosures procedures in place to capture all leases and that the narrative disclosures adequately describe their leasing arrangements.

💡 Key Takeaway: The completeness assertion is one of the most scrutinized areas in lease accounting audits, directly impacting narrative disclosures. We often test the underlying process used to identify and classify leases, which then informs the qualitative discussion.

Big Four firms, such as Deloitte, consistently emphasize the importance of a comprehensive understanding of a client's lease portfolio, requiring detailed qualitative disclosures1. We look for specific narrative elements that explain the why and how of a company's lease accounting, not just the what. This includes explanations of judgments regarding lease term, discount rates, and lease components.

Audit Focus Areas for Qualitative Lease Disclosures

Audit AreaAuditor's ObjectiveKey Documentation
Policy DescribedVerify the narrative accurately reflects the company's accounting policies for leases.Accounting policy memo, disclosure committee minutes
Judgments/AssumptionsAssess if significant judgments (e.g., lease term, discount rate) are clearly explained and reasonable.Lease population list, discount rate analysis, lease vs. non-lease component decisions
Leasing ActivitiesConfirm the narrative describes the nature of leasing activities (e.g., types of assets, lessee as lessor activities).Lease agreements, lease management system reports
Impact on FinancialsEvaluate the narrative explanation of how leasing activities affect the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow.Financial statements, management discussion and analysis (MD&A)
Control EffectivenessTest the procedures ensuring all leases are captured and disclosures are accurate.Internal control documentation, process flowcharts

Auditors leverage their understanding of internal controls to assess the risk of material misstatement in disclosures. If controls for lease identification testing are weak, our audit procedures around qualitative disclosures will be more extensive.

Key Risks and Failure Points

Inadequate qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements pose significant risks to financial reporting accuracy and audit integrity. These risks typically stem from a lack of understanding of the standard's nuances or insufficient internal processes.

  • Incomplete Lease Population Identification: Failure to identify all contracts that contain a lease, especially those with embedded leases, directly impacts the accuracy of narrative disclosures. Without a complete population, the story told about leasing activities is fundamentally flawed. This is a primary concern regarding what are the risks of incomplete lease population.
  • Insufficient Detail on Judgments: ASC 842 requires disclosure of significant judgments made in applying the standard. If the narrative lacks specific details on how lease terms were determined, or the methods used for discount rates, auditors will question the transparency and reliability of the disclosed information.
  • Misalignment with Quantitative Data: When the narrative explanation contradicts or fails to adequately support the quantitative figures presented in the financial statements, it raises significant red flags. This often indicates a disconnect between the accounting team responsible for calculations and those preparing the narrative.
  • Failure to Address Lease Modifications: Companies frequently modify existing leases. If the qualitative disclosures don't address the accounting policies and impact of these modifications, it represents a gap in compliance.
  • Lack of Discussion on Practical Expedients: If practical expedients were elected (e.g., not separating lease and non-lease components), the narrative must clearly state which ones were adopted and their impact. Skipping this detail is a common oversight we see.
  • Inadequate ROU Asset Disclosures: The narrative needs to explain the nature of the assets underlying the ROU asset disclosures and their typical lease terms, including any restrictions on their use. A generic statement simply isn't sufficient.

Example Scenario: A manufacturing company has numerous service contracts for machinery maintenance. These contracts frequently grant the company the right to use specific identified machines for an extended period. If the accounting team only focuses on contracts explicitly labeled "lease agreements," they might overlook these embedded leases. Consequently, their narrative disclosures would inaccurately portray the company's control over and use of assets through leasing, leading to an audit finding related to disclosure completeness and accuracy.

⚠️ Risk Alert: A common audit finding relates to companies overlooking service contracts and other non-traditional agreements that contain embedded leases. This directly impacts the accuracy and completeness of narrative disclosures.

Practical Checklist for Qualitative Lease Disclosures

Effectively addressing qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements demands a systematic approach. This checklist helps accounting teams ensure comprehensive coverage and clear communication within their financial statements.

Checklist for ASC 842 Qualitative Disclosures

Area of DisclosureKey Narrative ElementsDocumentation Required
Accounting Policies- Description of lease recognition criteria and measurement principles, including both finance and operating leases. <br> - Policy for short-term leases (expedient). <br> - Policy for leases of low-value assets (expedient, if elected).Lease accounting policy memo, ASC 842 implementation whitepaper
Nature of Leasing Activities- General description of the types of assets leased (e.g., real estate, vehicles, IT equipment). <br> - Terms and conditions of lease agreements (e.g., payment structures, renewal options, restrictions).Lease agreements, lease summary reports, Ultimate Guide to ASC 842 Lease Accounting
Significant Judgments- Explanation of how the lease term is determined, especially for contracts with options to extend/terminate. <br> - Description of the discount rate methodology, including implicit rates vs. incremental borrowing rates.Lease term analysis, discount rate support, management's judgment memos
Practical Expedients- Disclosure of elected practical expedients on transition (e.g., hindsight, land easements). <br> - Disclosure of elected accounting policy elections (e.g., non-separation of lease and non-lease components).Election memos, project implementation notes
Embedded Lease Discovery- Description of processes for identifying embedded leases in service or supply contracts.Embedded lease review policy, contract review log, decision matrix
Effect on Financials- Narrative explaining the impact of leasing activities on the balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash flows.Analysis tying qualitative narrative to quantitative notes, MD&A drafts

Best Practice: Proactively integrating embedded lease discovery into contract review processes is fundamental. This ensures the narrative truly reflects all leasing arrangements. For additional guidance, consider resources like the Top 10 Year-End Lease Accounting Challenges.

Q: How to identify embedded leases in contracts? A: Identifying embedded leases involves systematically reviewing all service, supply, and other non-lease contracts for two key criteria: an identified asset and the right to control its use. The presence of an identified asset usually means a specific asset is noted, or it's implicitly specified (e.g., "Company A will use machine X"). Control means the customer has the right to direct how and for what purpose the asset is used, and obtain substantially all the economic benefits.

How Accounting Teams Should Validate Their Approach

Validating qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements is a continuous process for accounting teams. It requires diligence and a clear line of sight between the underlying data, the accounting judgments, and the final disclosures. This methodical approach ensures that the narratives are not only compliant but also accurately reflect the entity's financial position.

  1. Cross-Functional Review: Engage stakeholders beyond the core accounting team. Legal counsel should review the wording related to contracts. Operations or procurement teams can validate the descriptions of assets and leasing activities.
  2. Consistency with Quantitative Disclosures: Ensure the narrative aligns precisely with the quantitative lease disclosures (e.g., quantitative lease disclosures). Any discrepancies will be a primary focus for auditors and signal a potential issue.
  3. Documentation of Judgments: For every significant judgment described in the narrative (e.g., lease term, discount rate, lease inception), robust documentation must exist. This includes memos, analyses, and approvals that support the conclusions reached. Per FASB ASC 842-20-50-3, entities must disclose significant judgments made related to their lease accounting2.
  4. Period-Over-Period Comparison: Review the qualitative disclosures against prior periods. Explain any changes in accounting policies, judgments, or the nature of leasing activities. This demonstrates thoughtfulness and consistency.
  5. External Benchmark: While direct copying is inappropriate, we often advise clients to review annual reports of peer companies to understand common practices and identify areas for improvement in clarity and detail for lease identification testing.
  6. Internal Audit or Expert Review: Prior to external audit, engage internal audit or an independent lease accounting expert to review the qualitative disclosures for compliance and clarity. This can help proactively identify and address potential issues before the external team arrives.

Calculation Example: Lease Term and Option Exercise

Scenario: A company leases a warehouse for an initial non-cancellable term of 5 years. The lease contract includes an option to renew for an additional 3 years at the lessee's discretion, and exercisable at a favorable rate. Management believes it is reasonably certain they will exercise the renewal option.

ComponentValueCalculation
Initial Term5 yearsContractual non-cancellable period
Renewal Option3 yearsManagement is reasonably certain to exercise
Total Lease Term8 years5 (Initial) + 3 (Renewal)

Key Takeaway: The qualitative disclosure narrative must explain how management determined the lease term, including the factors leading to the conclusion that the renewal option is reasonably certain to be exercised. This impacts both the quantitative ROU asset and lease liability, and the narrative explanation of judgments made.

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Failing to adequately prepare qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements often leads to audit deficiencies. Accounting teams must proactively address these common pitfalls.

Common MistakeHow to Avoid / Best Practice
Generic Boilerplate LanguageTailor disclosures to the company's specific leasing activities and policies. Avoid copying language directly from other companies' reports without customization. The narrative should tell your company’s story.
Lack of Specificity in JudgmentsDetail the specific facts and circumstances considered when making significant judgments (e.g., "The renewal option for our primary manufacturing facility was deemed reasonably certain because of the high cost of relocation and specialized fixtures, coupled with a history of renewals.").
Disclosures Disconnected from System DataImplement a robust lease accounting system that directly supports data extraction for disclosures. Regularly reconcile disclosure content back to the underlying lease data to ensure accuracy and reduce manual errors. This is crucial for strong qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements controls.
Neglecting Embedded LeasesEstablish a formal process for reviewing all contracts, not just those explicitly labeled leases, for embedded components. Train procurement, legal, and operational teams on how to identify embedded leases in contracts.
Inadequate Documentation for Narrative ElementsMaintain a disclosure binder or digital repository with support for every qualitative statement. This includes memos on policy choices, judgment analyses, and reconciliations. Documentation is required for qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements.
Ignoring the "Why" Behind the NumbersExplain the rationale behind significant accounting decisions described in the narrative. For instance, if an incremental borrowing rate was used, explain why the implicit rate was not readily determinable.

🚨 Critical: "What are common qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements audit findings?" Often include insufficient detail regarding significant judgments, failure to account for all leases (especially embedded ones), and inconsistencies between narrative and quantitative data. These can lead to material weaknesses.

What Strong Execution Looks Like in Practice

Strong execution in qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements signifies a mature lease accounting function that supports overall lease accounting compliance. It translates into clear, defensible, and comprehensive disclosures that stand up to audit scrutiny, ultimately fostering investor confidence and reducing compliance risk. A company with strong execution will have a well-defined process, supported by technology, and a clear understanding of its lease portfolio.

In practice, this means:

  • Proactive Planning: The accounting team begins drafting and gathering evidence for qualitative disclosures well in advance of financial reporting deadlines, often with a dedicated person or team responsible for the narrative alongside the quantitative figures.
  • Integrated Systems: A company utilizing a specialized lease accounting solution for lessee disclosures can generate reports that directly feed into the narrative, ensuring consistency between data and text.
  • Transparent Judgments: All significant judgments—from determining lease terms to selecting discount rates—are documented in detailed memos, reviewed by leadership, and readily available to auditors. This addresses the ASC 842 qualitative disclosure rules by having a clear internal framework.
  • Clear Policies: The company's lease accounting policies are not only well-documented but also communicated effectively across relevant departments, ensuring consistent application.
  • Audit-Ready Documentation: All supporting documentation for qualitative disclosures (e.g., contract reviews for embedded leases, impact assessments of modifications) is organized and readily retrievable, making the audit process smoother and more efficient.

For example, a company exhibiting strong execution might provide a detailed narrative on its strategy for managing real estate leases. This would include explanations for how they choose between finance and operating leases (where applicable for specific asset classes), their policy for short-term leases, and how they assess renewal options based on business strategy, all backed by clear examples and data. This level of detail provides complete transparency and significantly reduces auditor questions and potential findings.

Next Steps

Improving your organization's approach to qualitative lease disclosures: narrative requirements is an ongoing process that requires diligent attention to detail, robust processes, and a clear understanding of ASC 842. Focus on strong internal controls and thorough documentation to build a defensible and transparent financial reporting framework.

Related Articles


References

Footnotes

  1. Deloitte Audit & Assurance Services - Deloitte

  2. FASB Accounting Standards Codification - FASB